There are people who think that because some of the rulers commit acts of kufr and sin, we are obliged to rebel against them and attempt to change things even if that results in harming the Muslims in that country, at a time when there are many problems in the Muslim world. What is your opinion?
Praise be to Allah.The basic comprehensive principle of sharee’ah is that
it is not permitted to remove an evil by means of a greater evil; evil
must be warded off by that which will remove it or reduce it. Warding
off evil by means of a greater evil is not permitted according to the
scholarly consensus (ijmaa’) of the Muslims. If this group which wants
to get rid of this ruler who is openly committing kufr is able to do
so, and can bring in a good and righteous leader without that leading
to greater trouble for the Muslims or a greater evil than the evil of
this ruler, then that is OK. But if rebellion would result in greater
trouble and lead to chaos, oppression and the assassination of people
who do not deserve to be assassinated, and other forms of major evil,
then that is not permitted. Rather it is essential to be patient and
to hear and obey in matters of good, and to offer sincere advice to
the authorities, and to pray that they may be guided to good, and to
strive to reduce evil and increase good. This is the correct way which
should be followed, because that is in the general interests of the
Muslims, and because it will reduce evil and increase good, and because
this will keep the peace and protect the Muslims from a greater evil.